tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-183259682009-02-21T10:55:47.855ZDr Chris Flowers - Latest Breast Imaging NewsHere are the latest papers from all your favourite journalsLatest Imaging Newshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14023584422192666478noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18325968.post-1147695261591328302006-05-15T12:00:00.000Z2006-05-15T12:18:25.790ZThe BreastAtypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast: The controversial management of a borderline lesion: Experience of 47 cases diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/18325968-114769526159132830?l=rcrbg.blogspot.com'/></div>Latest Imaging Newshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14023584422192666478noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18325968.post-1130354436393783932005-10-26T19:07:00.000Z2005-10-26T19:20:36.400ZOctober 2005<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 0, 204);font-size:130%;" >RADIOLOGY - </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Breast Lesion Detection and Classification: Comparison of Screen-Film </span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-copy </span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Reading--Observer Performance Study</span><br /> Per Skaane, Corinne Balleyguier, Felix Diekmann, Susanne Diekmann,<br /> Jean-Charles Piguet, Kari Young, and Loren T. Niklason<br /> Radiology 2005;237 37-44<br /> <a href="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/37?etoc">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/37?etoc</a> <br /><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;">In the present study, results of the receiver operating characteristic </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> analyses showed a slightly higher overall reader diagnostic performance </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> rating with digital mammography, compared with screen-film mammography, </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> although the difference was not statistically significant.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization at Contrast-enhanced MR </span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">Mammography: Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine</span><br /> Federica Pediconi, Carlo Catalano, Rossella Occhiato, Fiammetta<br /> Venditti, Francesco Fraioli, Alessandro Napoli, Miles A. Kirchin, and<br /> Roberto Passariello<br /> Radiology 2005;237 45-56<br /> <a href="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/45?etoc">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/45?etoc </a><br /><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;">The results of the present study confirm the conclusions of a previous </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> investigation that the high T1 relaxivity of gadobenate dimeglumine </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> compared with that of gadopentetate dimeglumine is beneficial for </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> contrast-enhanced MR mammography</span>.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Benign versus Malignant Breast Masses: Optical Differentiation with </span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">US-guided Optical Imaging Reconstruction</span><br /> Quing Zhu, Edward B. Cronin, Allen A. Currier, Hugh S. Vine, Minming<br /> Huang, NanGuang Chen, and Chen Xu<br /> Radiology 2005;237 57-66<br /> <a href="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/57?etoc">http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/1/57?etoc</a> <br /><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> We believe that our technique, which incorporates optical tomography and </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> US localization, has demonstrated great potential to noninvasively </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> distinguish malignant from benign breast masses and thereby potentially </span><br /> <span style="font-style: italic;"> reduce the number of benign biopsy results.</span><br /><br /><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 153);font-size:130%;" >British Journal of Radiology - </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Optical transillumination spectroscopy to quantify parenchymal tissue </span><br /> <span style="font-weight: bold;">density: an indicator for breast cancer risk</span><br /> M K Simick and L Lilge<br /> Br J Radiol 2005;78 1009-1017<br /> <a href="http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/78/935/1009?etoc">http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/78/935/1009?etoc</a><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/18325968-113035443639378393?l=rcrbg.blogspot.com'/></div>Latest Imaging Newshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14023584422192666478noreply@blogger.com